If I loose all of a sudden if you remember of Law 30/1981, of July 7 passed by the Congress of Deputies on June 22 of that year, may that you did not say anything, but if you clarify that this is the Divorce Act, immediately sure remembers. After this short prologue will say that it is given because I remember at that time, before and after the passage of the law, the right church and screamed to the sky cursing everyone who disagreed with a law that in his opinion, of course heavily guarded, only served to destroy families and cause serious harm to children. So much was the thing that the June 18, 1981, Marcelo Gonzalez, who was then archbishop of Toledo, with the imminent adoption of the law, wanted to show their disagreement to the then Minister of Justice, the Government of the UCD, Francisco Fernández Ordoñez, and not allowed to attend the celebrations of Corpus Christi or the Mass being celebrated in Toledo, as traditionally had been doing all ministers of Justice. It just turned thirty years of the adoption of this law, but a few days ago, on the occasion of the visit of Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, this is without any double meaning, filled by Prince Felipe and Princess Letizia and giving the event both spouses are divorced, I noticed, had not thought about it until then, that for some time that the Church no longer swears by the thing of divorce and the right has fallen silent and no longer criticizes anyone. I come to think if this does not go given the fact that our prince has married a divorced lady, which on the other hand look very normal, not just for the sake of marriage, but the issue that due to divorce people can pick and choose when to give effect to those who want to share their life or part of it, and if this has also influenced the silence Church and right, some provosts of the right have been divorced, one of them has done so many times I do not remember how many. Before this I went further in my thinking and I wondered if the Church and the right stop cursing and criticizing the Abortion Act, in the rare case of a woman tied to a family of "good", because in this country still exist, for the Church of course, families of "good" or daughter or wife of someone imposing and highly committed to the Church decided to abort for any reason whatever, if this would be cause for all of them to silence their voices and do not curse or criticize more, but I have my doubts, as in "other times" women from these families as 'good', daughters or wives of high-flying characters and closely related to the Church, again, were going to London to have an abortion and, of course, that was not available to families who were not "well" Women who did not have that "quality" social and economic lot less, they could not afford the ticket to the next village for a bold man or woman will have an abortion with a needle crochet and that often cost them their lives. So if the Church and the right was well seen what abortion in London, and most years I do not remember hearing any kind of curse, much less critical on these trips to the City, to London, it is clear that the law is bad and is bad because to them it was necessary. They did not need laws, at least of this nature. But these are comments and reflections of mine that I do not think beyond what they are: Reflections and comments.
0 comments:
Post a Comment