At the time of writing this review the full General Council of Judicial Power have decided to ratify the second suspension from duty the judge Baltasar Garzón. Undoubtedly, this decision should have a technical or legal reasoning, but the truth is very striking that this suspension, which occurred in May 2010, is ratified as if it were a warning or some kind of eye what you do! At least give me that feeling. As is known
Judge Garzon was removed from office for alleged breach of trust, exceeding their authority, attempting to investigate the crimes of the Franco regime because apparently there is a law or a parliamentary agreement put into effect in the first democratic cuts meaning that crimes of dictatorship were already a matter of "hairs on the sea" also is accused of "making use of listening and recording devices in violation of constitutional guarantees in relation to recordings of prison conversations between the defendants and their case Gürtel lawyers. "
All of this is to say that the PP has been shown to strongly disagree, I would say that most "aggressive" with the fact that ETA has released Troitiño is applying the standard set, what the law says about , and instead be displayed fully agree that Judge Garzon is applied the law. In other words, as appropriate, the law should not interpreted and applied correctly but must be understood according to partisan interests who want to be favored. Is not the same laws apply to a member of ETA that he is putting them in the "showcase", which has brought them to the "public view". Obviously I'm not trying to defend anyone, I just want to express my opinion in the sense that the law is the law and should apply equally to everyone whether we like we like it more or less and no government can amend what the Administration of Justice ruled. I say the latter as the criticism of the Government by the PP.
Troitiño If your conviction was for acts of terrorism and in the case of Garzón to try to do justice to the victims of the Franco regime and its attempt to bring justice to a few alleged "criminals." Again, the law is the law but in most cases we make very difficult to understand the ordinary, but if the law was wrong with Troitiño, also may be wandering in the case of Garzón. In the PP disagree with that law is applied to Troitiño, I see normal, and displayed almost happy that it applies to Garzón which I also normal for his part as what they play. Anyway
ratification of the suspension seems too Garzón and up can someone come to think that justice is merciless with this judge.
0 comments:
Post a Comment