The CIS barometer for the month of April and one of the sections on the assessment by citizens of the economic situation is a fact that catches the eye. This is none other than the counterpoint implies that 78% of respondents assessed the situation country's economy as "bad or very bad", but when they were asked to rate the economic situation as at present staff have been given the following responses: Some 26% said their economic situation is "very good or good ". 50% said that "regular" and the remaining 24% replied that "bad or very bad." So when asked about the economic situation without qualification, the answer is quite disappointing, but when the answer is at the individual level we find that there is a percentage between "very good or good" and "regular" 76%. In other words, is not as "bad or very bad."
is becoming clear that each crisis as it values \u200b\u200bthe individual and is there a kind of psychosis, normal in any serious situation and out of the ordinary, which makes these contradictions occur and that rather than take a position the crisis in the right level they do is cause confusion for both the rulers and the citizens and it is known that the confusion can be passed to stark to exaggeration and loss of effectiveness when we know where and what really hurts is the true extent of evil, which is further complicated when looking for a remedy to combat it.
In these last days has been published the inflation data in April and this has been at 3.8% an unpleasant fact. But again, when it comes to economic assessments of the confusion arises. It turns out that the increase of two tenths over the previous month's rate is determined mainly by the price of package tours and food and nonalcoholic beverages. It turns out that as 78% of those surveyed by the CIS say the situation is "bad or very bad" but nevertheless the increase in the CPI data, which appears in the first place is that which corresponds with the expenditure that we make English on package tours, or leisure, entertainment and distraction, which I think is great but if the something is wrong if we say "missing beans", must prioritize where we spend our, in this case, little money.
Now we have that same dilemma that numbed the mind of one ruler who did not know if it was the bear who killed Fabila Fabila or who killed the bear. When not many months ago we were with deflation rates doused us all to shake that experts say are worse evils caused by the deflation that generates inflation. Deflation, and without going into technicalities and talking in plain for everyone to understand, is given by that supply exceeds demand, low consumption and therefore lower the prices and what is very important, the production sector suffers, to the suppliers of any commodity will go down in profits or losses as a result are business closures or reductions of templates. In short, the economy stagnates or rather low, and the money is conspicuous by its absence and the ghost of unemployment has dominion everywhere. On the other hand we have inflation yardstick that happy with being hit our pockets. Is in contrast to the deflation. Upload more demand, consumption, the supply, which is used by those producing consumer goods to raise prices and this causes many problems, type economic, consumers who see rising prices of things and their wages do not or at least the same proportion as prices rise because it that wages rise in accordance with the increase in prices is clear that it is a hoax and if they ask you to love / you of home. The economy is moving but not in the same direction, in the same direction, for everyone. Production lines to stop working, companies need benefits and jobs are maintained, is what usually or should happen, but the consumer's housekeeper / house or spend more money and becoming more free space is left in the refrigerator. That's why I said before that if it was the bear who killed who killed Fabila or Fabila the bear. It is unclear which is worse. Although the worst is all that is out of normal. The shortage is bad and too well.
Obviously, these findings are not an expert, but if a citizen suffering directly the consequences of the economy lurches and who better to speak of the harm caused by a flogging is one that has suffered.
And I just not understanding why that even when 78% of people surveyed by the CIS said that the economic situation is "bad or very bad", is that the tours go up in price and when prices increase because more demand than supply. I think you should rather say it is imposed, assess what impact this may have the black economy. That conjecture is not small. Is this a crisis in the English?
0 comments:
Post a Comment