Monday, May 2, 2011

Welcome Letter From Pastor

He who comes after Zaplana, a lucky

A María José Campanario, wife of skilled Ubrique Jesulín of the Audiencia Provincial de Cádiz has been notified that it will ultimately be judged by a suspected Social Security fraud. The President of the Third Chamber, Manuel Grosso, has decided to good eavesdropping made during the police investigation called "Operation Karlos."
The English Constitution regarding the rights and freedoms of the English states in article 14: "English people are equal before the law without any discrimination on grounds of birth, race, sex, religion, political or other condition or personal or social circumstance. "
The plot of the "case Naseiro" was launched on November 28, 1988 when members of the Special Narcotics Squad of the Police Board Valencia Superior proceeded to investigate an alleged traffic warrant of drugs using the "stick" phone line Palop. However, the contents of the tapes found to differ affairs since picked up conversations between prominent members of the Popular Party relating to, ultimately, fund the party.
On April 9, 1990, the then head of the Investigating juagar two of Valencia, Luis Manglano magistrate ordered the arrest of Rosendo Naseiro and Salvador Palop. Naseiro Rosendo, was then treasurer of the PP. The Supreme Prosecutor considered the facts of the crime of bribery in the degree of conspiracy by those who called for popular political A total of nine months in prison and 31.5 million pesetas. On June 18, 1990 the Supreme Court upheld the request of defense attorneys to quash as incriminating evidence recorded telephone conversations that had kept PP politicians and a businessman, considering that these fundamental rights had been violated. Specifically, the Supreme Court said that such wiretaps had violated the privacy rights of the accused. Finally on July 9, the prosecutor and the charges dropped all charges and void once the main evidence against them, wiretapping, it was impossible to keep the charges. On July 15 the Supreme Court dictates a sentence which states that it can only acquit the accused and not to dismiss the case as requested by the accusations because once open trial there is no other solution than sentencing. It also states that this has to be acquitted because the adversarial principle no one can be convicted if there is no charge previously. At that time, and despite not being accepted the recordings, which incidentally was ordered destroyed by the Supreme Court, was broadcast the same content in different media and in them were discussions between Salvador and Eduardo Zaplana Palop , in which he spoke of "comisioncitas" and receive "From under the table." Quite possibly this would have affected the "race" Zaplana policy if the court decision to overturn and destroy the tapes had not occurred. At that time was not yet mayor of Benidorm, which is known as served as a catapult to be chairman of the PP in Valencia, the Generalitat and later Minister of Labour.
What happened in the case Karlos, where he has been involved the wife of the bullfighter Jesulín Ubrique is identical as two drops of water, what happened in the case Naseiro regarding wiretapping. Officials of the Customs Oversight of Cadiz-dependent Tax- investigating a pattern of false invoices related to the fur of Ubrique but apparently crossed conversations that had nothing to do with the case under the listeners but presumably if they could be related to an attempt to Social Security fraud. This has made the wife of the bullfighter has been brought to justice, as at first I said, has given good wiretapping.
So before we recognize our ignorance and our inability to interpret what the laws say that we have found that "all English citizens are equal before the law" seems mere rhetoric, law, its proper application, is given as the interpretation that gives the presiding judge. I'm not questioning or criticizing anyone or putting into question the professionalism of anyone, as I said before that finding my quite possibly due to my lack of ability to interpret those things justice that lay people do not seem normal but which undoubtedly have their support because otherwise forget it.
Admittedly one was lucky and was able to "race", I mean Zaplana, and others and see how they look. In this treacherous world ...

0 comments:

Post a Comment